AREA REPORT
Vets in Canterbury
Prices, reviews and ownership for 6 practices
LOCAL OVERVIEW
Canterbury has 6 vet practices. Only 1 are independently owned and most are part of larger veterinary groups. Consultation fees range from £48 at Canterbury Sturry Rd Vets4Pets to around £71 at typical high street vets. Most practices here publish their prices online. The highest-rated practice is Canterbury Veterinary Surgery at 4.9 on Google.
6 practices5 in a group1 independent£57 avg consultation
17%
independent
£57
avg consultation
6
publish prices
Find vets near you
Enter your postcode for personalised results with distances and local pricing
Or browse all 6 Canterbury practices
What vets charge in Canterbury
6 cheapest consultations from 6 practices that publish prices
Who owns vets in Canterbury
Ownership breakdown across 6 practices
Independent 1
Pets at Home 2
IVC Evidensia 1
CVS Group 1
DNA Vetcare 1
Most practices in Canterbury are part of larger veterinary groups. Nationally, around half of all practices are part of larger groups. Here, 5 of 6 are part of larger groups.
Larger groups
Pets at Home
2 practices
Pets at Home plc
IVC Evidensia
1 practice
Nestlé / EQT / Silver Lake
CVS Group
1 practice
Public (LSE listed)
DNA Vetcare
1 practice
Canterbury vet rankings
6 practices in your area
Common questions about vets in Canterbury
Consultation fees in Canterbury range from £48 to £71. The average across 6 practices that publish their prices is £57. Canterbury Sturry Rd Vets4Pets offers the lowest published consultation at £48.
Rightvet has indexed 6 vet practices in Canterbury. 1 are independently owned and 5 are part of larger veterinary groups including Pets at Home, IVC Evidensia, CVS Group.
The highest-rated practice on Google is Canterbury Veterinary Surgery at 4.9★ in Canterbury.
Vets in nearby towns
Vets in Whitstable6 practices· avg £61
Vets in Herne Bay3 practices· avg £66
Vets in Faversham6 practices· avg £55
Vets in Folkestone4 practices· avg £60
Vets in Hythe2 practices
Vets in Sandwich2 practices
See something wrong? Suggest a correction