rightvet.

AREA REPORT

Vets in Manchester

Prices, reviews and ownership for 37 practices

LOCAL OVERVIEW

Manchester has 37 vet practices. Only 10 are independently owned and most are part of larger veterinary groups. Consultation fees range from £40 at Harrison Family Vets Tyldesley to around £80 at typical high street vets. Most practices here publish their prices online. The highest-rated practice is Pet Medical Centre at 5.0 on Google.

37 practices27 in a group10 independent£57 avg consultation
27%
independent
£57
avg consultation
30
publish prices

Find vets near you

Enter your postcode for personalised results with distances and local pricing

Or browse all 37 Manchester practices

What vets charge in Manchester

10 cheapest consultations from 30 practices that publish prices

1
Harrison Family Vets Tyldesley
Smaller group: Harrison Family Vets (8 practices)
£40
3.9/5
2
Harrison Family Vets Didsbury
Smaller group: Harrison Family Vets (8 practices)
£40
3.9/5
3
Atherton Veterinary Centre
Largest group: IVC Evidensia (716 practices)
£44
4.8/5
4
Agi-Vet
Independent practice
£45
4.0/5
5
Medivet Tyldesley / Tyldesley Veterinary Centre
Largest group: Medivet & Partners (294 practices)
£46
4.4/5
6
Trafford Veterinary Centre
Independent practice
£48
4.6/5
7
Baguley Veterinary Centre
Smaller group: Baguley Veterinary Centre (2 practices)
£50
4.0/5
8
Swinton Vets4Pets Ltd
Joint venture: Pets at Home (350 practices)
£51
4.4/5
9
Trafford Park Vets4Pets
Joint venture: Pets at Home (350 practices)
£51
4.3/5
10
Middleton Vets4Pets
Joint venture: Pets at Home (350 practices)
£52
4.4/5
See all 30 practices with pricing →

7 practices in Manchester don't publish their consultation prices online. Pricing transparency is one of the issues the CMA veterinary market investigation is addressing.

Who owns vets in Manchester

Ownership breakdown across 37 practices

Independent 10
CVS Group 9
Pets at Home 7
IVC Evidensia 6
VetPartners 2
Medivet 2
Animal Trust 1
Most practices in Manchester are part of larger veterinary groups. Nationally, around half of all practices are part of larger groups. Here, 27 of 37 are part of larger groups.

Larger groups

CVS Group
9 practices
Public (LSE listed)
Pets at Home
7 practices
Pets at Home plc
IVC Evidensia
6 practices
Nestlé / EQT / Silver Lake
VetPartners
2 practices
BC Partners
Medivet
2 practices
CVC Capital Partners
Animal Trust
1 practice

Manchester vet rankings

37 practices in your area

Harrison Family Vets Didsbury

M20 2ZE·£40 consultationSmaller group: Harrison Family Vets
4.6(184)

Harrison Family Vets Tyldesley

M29 8QH·£40 consultationSmaller group: Harrison Family Vets
4.6(37)

Atherton Veterinary Centre

M46 9JZ·£44 consultationLargest group: IVC Evidensia
4.6(552)

Agi-Vet

M27 8WA·£45 consultationIndependent practice
4.9(501)

Medivet Tyldesley / Tyldesley Veterinary Centre

M29 8FJ·£46 consultationLargest group: Medivet & Partners
4.5(352)

Trafford Veterinary Centre

M41 0SS·£48 consultationIndependent practice
4.7(288)

Baguley Veterinary Centre

M23 1WA·£50 consultationSmaller group: Baguley Veterinary Centre
4.3(172)

Swinton Vets4Pets Ltd

M27 6AH·£51 consultationJoint venture: Pets at Home
4.5(514)

Trafford Park Vets4Pets

M41 7FN·£51 consultationJoint venture: Pets at Home
4.3(255)

Middleton Vets4Pets

M24 2QA·£52 consultationJoint venture: Pets at Home
4.5(455)

Common questions about vets in Manchester

Consultation fees in Manchester range from £40 to £80. The average across 30 practices that publish their prices is £57. Harrison Family Vets Tyldesley offers the lowest published consultation at £40.
Rightvet has indexed 37 vet practices in Manchester. 10 are independently owned and 27 are part of larger veterinary groups including CVS Group, Pets at Home, IVC Evidensia.
The highest-rated practice on Google is Pet Medical Centre at 5.0★ in Manchester.

Vets in nearby towns

Vets in Salford2 practices
Vets in Sale2 practices
Vets in Altrincham5 practices· avg £48
Vets in Cheadle3 practices· avg £61
Vets in Heywood2 practices
Vets in Bury6 practices· avg £56

See something wrong? Suggest a correction