rightvet.

AREA REPORT

Vets in Hull

Prices, reviews and ownership for 17 practices

LOCAL OVERVIEW

Hull has 17 vet practices. None are independently owned and most are part of larger veterinary groups. Consultation fees range from £47 at Hull Stoneferry Vets4Pets to around £65 at typical high street vets. Around half publish their consultation prices. The highest-rated practice is Wicstun Veterinary Group at 4.9 on Google.

17 practices17 in a group£54 avg consultation
0%
independent
£54
avg consultation
10
publish prices

Find vets near you

Enter your postcode for personalised results with distances and local pricing

Or browse all 17 Hull practices

What vets charge in Hull

10 cheapest consultations from 10 practices that publish prices

1
Hull Stoneferry Vets4Pets
Joint venture: Pets at Home (475 practices)
£47
4.5/5
2
Norwood Veterinary Group
Largest group: Linnaeus (210 practices)
£49
4.1/5
3
Vets4Pets
Joint venture: Pets at Home (475 practices)
£50
4.4/5
4
Wicstun Veterinary Group
Largest group: Linnaeus (210 practices)
£52
3.7/5
5
Medivet Sutton on Hull (Chestnut House Veterinary Centre)
Largest group: Medivet & Partners (362 practices)
£53
4.4/5
6
Hull Vets4Pets Ltd
Joint venture: Pets at Home (475 practices)
£54
4.5/5
7
Haven Veterinary Group
Largest group: VetPartners (358 practices)
£56
4.8/5
8
Medivet Hull the Avenues - Chants Vets
Largest group: Medivet & Partners (362 practices)
£58
3.7/5
9
Medivet Patrington / Cygnet Veterinary Centre
Largest group: Medivet & Partners (362 practices)
£59
4.4/5
10
Medivet Swanland 24 Hour / Swanbridge Veterinary Hospital
Largest group: Medivet & Partners (362 practices)
£65
4.5/5

7 practices in Hull don't publish their consultation prices online. Pricing transparency is one of the issues the CMA veterinary market investigation is addressing.

Who owns vets in Hull

Ownership breakdown across 17 practices

IVC Evidensia 6
Medivet 4
Pets at Home 3
VetPartners 2
Linnaeus 2
Most practices in Hull are part of larger veterinary groups. Nationally, around half of all practices are part of larger groups. Here, 17 of 17 are part of larger groups.

Larger groups

IVC Evidensia
6 practices
Nestlé / EQT / Silver Lake
Medivet
4 practices
CVC Capital Partners
Pets at Home
3 practices
Pets at Home plc
VetPartners
2 practices
BC Partners
Linnaeus
2 practices
Mars, Inc.

Hull vet rankings

17 practices in your area

Hull Stoneferry Vets4Pets

HU7 0BT·£47 consultationJoint venture: Pets at Home
4.7(1,026)

Norwood Veterinary Group

HU7 3NS·£49 consultationLargest group: Linnaeus
4.7(350)

Vets4Pets

HU10 6RJ·£50 consultationJoint venture: Pets at Home
4.6(370)

Wicstun Veterinary Group

HU15 2AT·£52 consultationLargest group: Linnaeus
4.9(67)

Medivet Sutton on Hull (Chestnut House Veterinary Centre)

HU8 9HL·£53 consultationLargest group: Medivet & Partners
4.6(208)

Hull Vets4Pets Ltd

HU5 5NA·£54 consultationJoint venture: Pets at Home
4.7(620)

Haven Veterinary Group

HU9 3JA·£56 consultationLargest group: VetPartners
4.7(187)

Medivet Hull the Avenues - Chants Vets

HU5 3TG·£58 consultationLargest group: Medivet & Partners
4.5(261)

Medivet Patrington / Cygnet Veterinary Centre

HU12 0NA·£59 consultationLargest group: Medivet & Partners
4.6(206)

Medivet Swanland 24 Hour / Swanbridge Veterinary Hospital

HU14 3NG·£65 consultationLargest group: Medivet & Partners
4.7(540)

Common questions about vets in Hull

Consultation fees in Hull range from £47 to £65. The average across 10 practices that publish their prices is £54. Hull Stoneferry Vets4Pets offers the lowest published consultation at £47.
Rightvet has indexed 17 vet practices in Hull. All 17 are part of larger veterinary groups including IVC Evidensia, Medivet, Pets at Home.
The highest-rated practice on Google is Wicstun Veterinary Group at 4.9★ in Hull.

Vets in nearby towns

Vets in Barton Upon Humber2 practices
Vets in Beverley4 practices· avg £44
Vets in Driffield4 practices· avg £62
Vets in Brigg3 practices· avg £51
Vets in Grimsby5 practices
Vets in Bridlington3 practices· avg £57
Browse all areas →

See something wrong? Suggest a correction