AREA REPORT
Vets in Portsmouth
Prices, reviews and ownership for 11 practices
LOCAL OVERVIEW
Portsmouth has 11 vet practices. Only 3 are independently owned and most are part of larger veterinary groups. Consultation fees range from £26 at Portsmouth Vets to around £75 at typical high street vets. Most practices here publish their prices online. The highest-rated practice is Portsmouth Vets at 5.0 on Google.
11 practices8 in a group3 independent£60 avg consultation
27%
independent
£60
avg consultation
11
publish prices
Find vets near you
Enter your postcode for personalised results with distances and local pricing
Or browse all 11 Portsmouth practices
What vets charge in Portsmouth
10 cheapest consultations from 11 practices that publish prices
See all 11 practices with pricing →
Who owns vets in Portsmouth
Ownership breakdown across 11 practices
Independent 3
CVS Group 4
Pets at Home 2
VetPartners 1
IVC Evidensia 1
Most practices in Portsmouth are part of larger veterinary groups. Nationally, around half of all practices are part of larger groups. Here, 8 of 11 are part of larger groups.
Larger groups
CVS Group
4 practices
Public (LSE listed)
Pets at Home
2 practices
Pets at Home plc
VetPartners
1 practice
BC Partners
IVC Evidensia
1 practice
Nestlé / EQT / Silver Lake
Portsmouth vet rankings
11 practices in your area
Common questions about vets in Portsmouth
Consultation fees in Portsmouth range from £26 to £75. The average across 11 practices that publish their prices is £60. Portsmouth Vets offers the lowest published consultation at £26.
Rightvet has indexed 11 vet practices in Portsmouth. 3 are independently owned and 8 are part of larger veterinary groups including CVS Group, Pets at Home, VetPartners.
The highest-rated practice on Google is Portsmouth Vets at 5.0★ in Portsmouth.
Vets in nearby towns
Vets in Waterlooville6 practices· avg £65
Vets in Havant3 practices
Vets in Hayling Island2 practices
Vets in Gosport2 practices
Vets in Fareham5 practices· avg £63
Vets in Ryde3 practices
See something wrong? Suggest a correction