AREA REPORT
Vets in Trowbridge
Prices, reviews and ownership for 3 practices
LOCAL OVERVIEW
Trowbridge has 3 vet practices. None are independently owned and most are part of larger veterinary groups. Consultation fees range from £61 at Glenleigh Veterinary Practice (Garston Vet Group) to around £65 at typical high street vets. Most practices here publish their prices online. The highest-rated practice is Harris at 4.6 on Google.
3 practices3 in a group£63 avg consultation
0%
independent
£63
avg consultation
3
publish prices
Find vets near you
Enter your postcode for personalised results with distances and local pricing
Or browse all 3 Trowbridge practices
What vets charge in Trowbridge
3 cheapest consultations from 3 practices that publish prices
Who owns vets in Trowbridge
Ownership breakdown across 3 practices
CVS Group 1
Linnaeus 1
Pets at Home 1
Most practices in Trowbridge are part of larger veterinary groups. Nationally, around half of all practices are part of larger groups. Here, 3 of 3 are part of larger groups.
Larger groups
CVS Group
1 practice
Public (LSE listed)
Linnaeus
1 practice
Mars, Inc.
Pets at Home
1 practice
Pets at Home plc
Trowbridge vet rankings
3 practices in your area
Glenleigh Veterinary Practice (Garston Vet Group)
BA14 9EW·£61 consultationLargest group: Linnaeus
4.5(275)
Common questions about vets in Trowbridge
Consultation fees in Trowbridge range from £61 to £65. The average across 3 practices that publish their prices is £63. Glenleigh Veterinary Practice (Garston Vet Group) offers the lowest published consultation at £61.
Rightvet has indexed 3 vet practices in Trowbridge. All 3 are part of larger veterinary groups including CVS Group, Linnaeus, Pets at Home.
The highest-rated practice on Google is Harris at 4.6★ in Trowbridge.
Vets in nearby towns
Vets in Bradford-On-Avon2 practices
Vets in Westbury3 practices· avg £62
Vets in Melksham5 practices· avg £59
Vets in Corsham3 practices· avg £52
Vets in Warminster5 practices· avg £62
Vets in Frome3 practices· avg £65
See something wrong? Suggest a correction